Rubber Demo Project Inaugurated In Chethackal, Kerala

Rubber certainly has its role to play in forest landscapes across the world, with natural rubber plantations having risen as a substantial basis of deforestation. One element that addresses deforestation concerns is the correct certification of rubber – be it natural or synthetic. International Sustainability & Carbon Certification (ISCC), a globally leading certification system, works with the objective of providing sustainability solutions for fully traceable and deforestation-free supply chains, inter alia involving the rubber industry. ISCC was one of the presenters at the Tire Technology Expo 2022 at Hannover, Germany, and Dr Jan M Henke, Director, ISCC, threw light on the nitty-gritty of certifications in the rubber industry, their clients in the tyre and rubber industry and more, in an interaction with Tyre Trends.

Can you tell us about your global sustainability scheme?
Our global sustainability and carbon certification scheme has certified companies in more than 100 countries. We certify entire supply chains from farms to plantations and forestry, and also the point of origin of waste and residues, biogenic and fossil waste. This is also covering rubber and natural rubber. Moreover, we cover biogenic waste and residues, including fossil waste, like carbon black, which is, again, used in the rubber industry. We also certify pyrolysis, where recycled mixed plastic waste can help produce synthetic rubber out of the pyrolysis oil. And we certify the entire supply chain, sustainability of raw material.

What is Meo’s role?
Meo initiated ISCC in a multi-stakeholder process a long time ago. It once was a Meo project and went on to become an operations and certification scheme. It was even recognised by the European Commission and some other authorities. It later got segregated from Meo, and ISCC is governed by the ISCC Association with more than 200 members.

So, what role does Meo play in this in case of certification?
Certification is always by independent, third-party certification bodies. ISCC is the standard development. Today’s ISCC was once a project of Meo. It then went on to become independent and operational, and was no longer a project but an individual entity running and further developing and improving the certification scheme.

The operations of the certification system, database, registration, qualification, training programme, integrity programme, the website and all the day-to-day business is done by ISCC. We are currently incorporating 45 certification bodies that are actually doing the on-site audits based on the ISCC standard.

Is ISCC recognised by the European Union?
Yes, it is being used in many sectors, like in bio energy, bio fuel, renewable transport fuels etc. In fact, ISCC is also recognised by the European Commission and by companies based on their sustainability standards and different industry initiatives.

Hence, ISCC is active on a really broad scale, covering different types of raw materials, natural rubber being one of them. We are also covering waste and residues for pyrolysis and their outputs. We then go to all the different end markets, which can be polymers, rubber, tyres, packaging, all types of plastic products, bio energy or any type of renewable fuels, aviation fuels, maritime fuels etc. This is global and is being used in more than 100 countries.

Tyre companies are talking about sustainability, but the larger part of the industry is of small stakeholders, especially in the natural rubber segment, where traceability and accountability are the main issues. How do you see this?
That’s a big challenge, especially in rubber production. At the cultivation level, there are a lot of small holders. There also exist large plantations that are easier to implement and certify. However, it’s definitely a bigger challenge with the small holders; it always depends on how well they are organised, whether there are certain structures, cooperatives or some central units.

Can you tell us about the certification of natural rubber?
The certification of natural rubber is definitely possible. Palm oil is maybe another example where the setup is quite similar sometimes. Also, with respect to the small holders, sometimes the companies are the same. Furthermore, we are very active in the palm oil sector with ISCC. We now also see a demand for natural rubber sustainability certification.

Is there a different process for getting certified in the rubber industry or is it a standard process?
It’s a standard process. It works on plantation. In fact, it works more or less the same as for palm plantations. But you certainly need to make sure that all the small holders reach a certain level, which is difficult. So starting out, bigger plantations may be easier because it’s easier for them to properly prepare for the certification audits. And then, you need to involve more farmers, step by step.

Who decides the standard process to get the certifications?
ISCC develops the standards and the requirements in the multi-stakeholder process. It then comes down to a company saying that it wants to become certified, use ISCC and also make certain claims and communications to its customers and stakeholders. They then reach out to a certification body, that is cooperating with ISCC. Following this, the certification body will do the audit on site – the third-party auditor will also make a decision on the issuance of the certificate.

Can tyre manufacturers get different certifications? For instance, one for natural rubber and another one for synthetic rubber? Or do they get one for all?
If tyre manufacturers source raw material for manufacturing from natural rubber but also synthetic rubber and everything under ISCC, then it’s one audit. Then the auditor would look into aspects of the volume of natural rubber being used that has been certified, although upstream. If one buys from certified suppliers and if the same auditors check, then aspects like the share of the certified synthetic rubber being used, the share of carbon black, etc. are taken into account. And finally, everything can be put together and a certain claim can be made.

Can tyre companies get a separate certificate for natural rubber?
Yes, they can. They can have separate certificates for natural and synthetic rubber both, or even of everything together. As for the final tyre, let’s say, if it’s 20 percent natural rubber and 20 percent synthetic rubber (40 percent of the tyre), then they can make certain sustainability claims on use of sustainable, circular materials etc.

What is the value of a certification?
It’s no deforestation – that’s key when it comes to natural rubber. When you certify, ‘no deforestation’ is the core requirement and deforestation is not allowed under ISCC. It is about additional environmental and social human rights criteria. This fits fine in this part of ISCC’s sustainability standard. And then it’s certainly about traceability in the supply chain, all the way in the end to the final tyre. And if this is established, then you can certainly make claims about the rubber or the final tyre, saying that it has been sustainably produced, based on sustainably sourced raw materials etc.

Plus, if you do this in a smart way, then you can actually cover the natural and synthetic rubber. Natural rubber and synthetic rubber are both very important parts of the final tyre. Both can be covered under ISCC.

Deforestation is a big issue, mainly in Southeast Asian and African countries. How difficult is it to keep an eye on that?
It’s not always easy to handle. Deforestation is not allowed under ISCC; there is a cut-off date of January 2008. If there was deforestation after January 2008, one cannot become certified. However, replanting or a change from palm to rubber is not considered as deforestation.

For example, if you have a palm plantation and if you cut it and plant rubber after 25 years, then that’s not deforestation. That’s just normal replanting.

Also, ISCC is certainly doing assessments, supported by remote sensing. Our core principle is no deforestation, which is very important to ISCC and its stakeholders. ISCC is not just us doing the operations in Cologne; there’s the ISCC Association for the multi-stakeholder dialogue. It has over 200 members from entire supply chains, industries, plantation companies, mineral oil, chemical companies, converters etc. We also have research organisations from different regions involved. In fact, also a number of non-governmental organisations are members of the ISCC Association.

The association meets annually and makes important strategic decisions and elects the ISCC Board. Due to the representation of the research sector and non-governmental organisations, there is quite a good balance of what people want and further development.

Can you tell us about the commercial benefits involved in having a certification?
There is a big value in it. It reduces sustainability risks for companies, helps to establish monitoring, protects the license to operate and has commercial value. For example, the OEMs ask for more sustainable products or lower greenhouse gas emissions. They all have climate neutrality commitments in place and need to start delivering step-by-step now; they need to show what are the activities that they are engaged in and how those improve sustainability in the overall supply chain. Here, ISCC certification can be used.

How do you maintain transparency in certification as a third party?
There is an annual audit. The certificate is valid for one year and then there is a re-certification. The company needs to provide evidence in every re-certification that the rules are being followed. And if they are not, a renewal of the certificates is not possible.

We certainly have quality management and training for companies and the auditors as well, who conduct on-site audits. What’s more, we have our own integrity programmes, where we send out our own auditors. These auditors work for ISCC and double-check the performance of the companies and the work of third-party auditors. Therefore, this integrity programme is key. We have the website where all the certificates are being published and the entire standard is public.

Do you help companies improve their sustainability supply chain?
No, we don’t consult. At ISCC, we are not involved in supporting the companies in order to improve. We have the standard and we conduct the training for companies. The preparation for the audit is not where ISCC is involved; it’s independent from that type of work. And the certification bodies are not allowed to consult in parallel either. ISCC is the independent standard that is used to certify that companies fulfil the sustainability requirements.

What are the other segments that you cover in the tyre industry?
It’s the entire supply chain. Petrochemical industries, tyre manufacturers etc. can all be covered. This also includes everything from plantations to the end product in the tyre industry.

Which is the easiest and the toughest one to certify?
All elements of the supply chain need to be covered.

This can sometimes be a challenge in the beginning, so as to convince your suppliers and also get certified. But, in truth, we have more than 6,000 certificates under ISCC. So there are already a lot of players that have valid certificates, and now this is starting to move into the space of rubber and tyre manufacturers.

Can you tell us about your clients in the rubber and tyre industry?
We have requests from many tyre producers right now. Some producers are certified already. Plus, we have requests for carbon black and first requests for natural rubber. We see the number of requests increasing, and we do have first certificates and first registrations from tyre producers. So we expect this to rise further as the industry needs to show compliance with their sustainability and climate neutrality commitments.

We see the entire tyre industry now targeting sustainability. So how do you find more opportunities and what’s your plan to get more client support?
ISCC started to get really further engaged in the rubber and tyre industry about a year ago; the industry has started understanding the standards, participating in ISCC trainings, joining our stakeholder events etc. Therefore, step by step, they got to know ISCC better and what it could do for them. They have now even started to get involved and do certifications, including reaching out all the way to the cultivation of natural rubber.

Are you going to focus on the Asian market?
Yes. In fact, we already have a few hundred certificates in Malaysia, Indonesia and other countries in the region. These markets are truly important. Our other key markets are North America and Europe, while we are also active in Africa and South America.

We are, eventually, trying to do more and convince people to become certified, show compliance to sustainability requirements, engage in a continuous improvement approach to become more sustainable and then allow manufacturers to really make claims.  

Continental Adds Conti Eco HT 5 Trailer Tyre To Fifth-Generation Range

Continental Adds Conti Eco HT 5 Trailer Tyre To Fifth-Generation Range

Continental has expanded its fifth-generation Conti Eco range for freight transport with the Conti Eco HT 5, a trailer tyre that joins the Conti Eco HS 5 steer and Conti Eco HD 5 drive products. The trio forms a coordinated package aimed at cutting operating costs, sustaining high mileage and lowering rolling resistance to support better fuel economy. Although trailer axles are not driven, their tyres still shape how efficiently a rig moves. By targeting that axle, Continental extends the Generation 5 advantages across the full vehicle combination for regional and long-haul duty. Less resistance at the trailer can translate into reduced fuel burn and, in turn, lower operational CO₂ output.

Because a trailer rolls on several tyres that never leave the road, those tyres directly affect stability, efficiency and day-to-day performance. In some configurations, they generate as much as half of a truck-trailer combination's total rolling resistance. Continental engineered the Conti Eco HT 5 to reconcile low rolling resistance with long tread life, encouraging uniform wear and dependable traction in a broad range of conditions. Optimised materials, a fresh sidewall design and advanced filler compounds underpin the tyre's fuel-saving characteristics.

Mileage and durability come from a new tread compound paired with a refined curing method, while a redesigned five-rib tread layout supports even wear, steady handling and consistent behaviour across shifting weather and road surfaces on both regional and long-distance routes. Tested against the Conti Hybrid HT3+, the Conti Eco HT 5 posted rolling resistance reductions of as much as 12 percent under specified conditions, offering fleets a path to lower fuel use, diminished CO₂ emissions and reduced tyre-related costs.

The Generation 5 Conti Eco portfolio sits within Continental's broader strategy of helping customers boost transport efficiency through technological innovation and tuned tyre performance. Uniting low rolling resistance, high mileage and long service life at every axle position, the range addresses industry pressures such as climbing fuel prices and stricter efficiency and emissions expectations. The Conti Eco HT 5 reaches the market in September 2026 in two sizes, 385/65 R 22.5 and 385/55 R 22.5.

Hinnerk Kaiser, responsible for the development of truck and bus tyres in the EMEA region at Continental, said, “Every tyre contributes to the efficiency and operating costs of a truck and trailer combination. While attention often focuses on the steer and drive axles, trailer tyres also play an important role in rolling resistance and fuel consumption. With the Conti Eco HT 5, we are extending the benefits of our fifth-generation Conti Eco portfolio to the trailer axle and helping fleets improve the efficiency of their transport operations. For the Conti Eco HT 5, our focus was on improving efficiency while maintaining durability. The combination of low rolling resistance, long service life and balanced wear characteristics can help fleets reduce tyre-related operating costs while maintaining reliable performance in demanding transport operations.”

Titan International Inks Definitive Agreement To Sell ITM Business To USCO

Titan International Inks Definitive Agreement To Sell ITM Business To USCO

Titan International, Inc. has reached a definitive agreement to divest its Italtractor ITM undercarriage business (ITM) to USCO S.p.A., marking a significant strategic shift for the global off-highway wheel, tyre and undercarriage manufacturer. The deal positions Titan to concentrate on its core operations while securing substantial cash value from the sale.

Under the agreement, Titan will receive an initial purchase price of USD 207 million, with the potential for an additional USD 6 million in earnout proceeds contingent on ITM meeting specified performance targets for 2026. Customary adjustments tied to ITM’s net asset and financial position at closing are expected to add approximately USD 23 million in cash value. Combined with USD 49 million in dividends from ITM – USD 38 million already received in recent years and USD 11 million anticipated before closing – Titan projects total cash value of up to approximately USD 285 million, inclusive of the earnout.

The transaction allows Titan to sharpen its focus on its global wheel and tire operations serving agricultural, construction and consumer markets. According to Chairman Maurice M Taylor, Jr, the potential sale of ITM was first discussed with the board over a decade ago when an offer below USD 100 million was presented. He credited President and CEO Paul Reitz and his team for their patience in completing a deal that he described as fair for Titan and beneficial for USCO, which gains a strong manufacturing business with a good brand and skilled workforce. Taylor also praised Cecilia La Manna for nearly 30 years of service and leadership, noting that USCO is acquiring a strong management team along with the business and plants.

Reitz characterised the transaction as an important step in Titan’s transformation, delivering strong value while providing ITM with an owner that understands the undercarriage sector. He said the deal enables Titan to direct people, capital and resources towards core wheel and tyre operations, pursue accretive growth opportunities and reduce debt. The move supports portfolio reshaping, accelerated strategic investments, transformative acquisitions and partnership, and long-term shareholder value.

As part of USCO, ITM will build on its position as a global provider of undercarriage components and complete solutions, with added focus and resources for long-term growth, customer service, product innovation and geographic expansion. ITM designs, manufactures and distributes undercarriage systems for construction, mining, forestry, road-building and agricultural applications through an international network and is a pioneer in undercarriage sensor technology, including its TRUST ITM monitoring solution.

Titan intends to use a portion of the proceeds to reduce existing debt and strengthen its balance sheet, with future capital deployment towards key growth investments, including accretive acquisitions and strategic partnerships. The transaction is expected to close in early January 2027, subject to customary closing conditions and required regulatory approvals, with both companies continuing ordinary operations until then. Gianni & Origoni and Poggi & Associati advised Titan and ITM on legal and tax matters, while USCO received assistance from Eidos Partners, Simmons+Simmons, BDO and KPMG.

NEXEN TIRE Launches N'FERA Sport 2 With Sharper Handling And Shorter Braking

NEXEN TIRE Launches N'FERA Sport 2 With Sharper Handling And Shorter Braking

NEXEN TIRE has unveiled the N’FERA Sport 2, an ultra-high-performance summer tyre succeeding the widely acclaimed N’FERA Sport. The original earned strong results in independent tests by leading DACH-region automotive publications, including ADAC and AUTO BILD, and secured multiple original equipment fitments. The new model adopts an updated tread pattern and revised construction to deliver sharper handling, shorter braking distances and dependable performance in both wet and dry conditions.

Structural rigidity has been raised by 15 percent over the predecessor, reducing tyre deformation and supporting stable behaviour during dynamic driving. NEXEN TIRE also incorporated Chamfer Technology, whose specially shaped block edges enlarge the contact area under braking and cornering. Meanwhile, the outer tread blocks are 5 percent wider, transferring vehicle power to the road more efficiently and improving cornering stability. A rim protector 7 percent wider than before adds protection against curb contact.

The tread design distributes pressure more evenly across the footprint, enlarging road contact and balancing handling, traction and braking while limiting heat buildup. Increased sidewall rigidity further cuts deformation and sharpens steering response, especially in high-speed corners. Collectively, these measures yield a 10 percent gain in cornering stiffness relative to the previous N’FERA Sport. Multi-width grooves and chamfered block edges widen the drainage area, helping evacuate water, lower aquaplaning risk and preserve wet-road grip.

Testing at Spain’s IDIADA Proving Ground demonstrated measurable gains over the outgoing tyre. NEXEN TIRE’s own results show an 11 percent shorter wet braking distance and a 2 percent shorter dry braking distance. Wet and dry handling improved by 7 percent, while cornering stiffness rose by 10 percent. The N’FERA Sport 2 is engineered to provide confident control across a broad range of road conditions.

Jeff Roh, Vice President of Europe Sales & Marketing, said, “Following the success of the N’FERA Sport, we expect the new N’FERA Sport 2 to deliver even stronger results. NEXEN TIRE has demonstrated proven quality and performance over the years, and with the improved capabilities of the new pattern, we aim to further enhance driving performance while helping drivers enjoy the thrill of driving with greater confidence and safety.”

Dunlop Crowns New Superstock And Production Trophy champions At Bol d’Or Season Finale

Dunlop Crowns New Superstock And Production Trophy champions At Bol d’Or Season Finale

Dunlop concluded the 2026 FIM Endurance World Championship by celebrating its Superstock Trophy and Production Trophy title winners at the 89th Bol d’Or. The French endurance classic, held under largely clear skies at Circuit Paul Ricard, brought the season to a dramatic close with 43 teams relying on Dunlop’s KR racing slicks across every category. Throughout the year, Dunlop supplied its KR108 and KR109 slick options to all entrants, alongside a latest-generation medium front tyre known during development as G2_01 VAL3.

In the Dunlop-exclusive Superstock Trophy, the No. 77 Wójcik Racing Team claimed a maiden crown. Jordi Torres Fernandez, Milan Pawelec, Mateusz Molik and Hector Vicent Garzo finished sixth overall, lifting the Polish squad above the No. 38 Champion-Hert Powered by MRP entry, which ended 11th in class. The No. 36 3ART Best Of Bike Hamaguchi team took second in the standings, while reigning champions No. 44 Honda No Limits completed the top three after finishing third in the race. The No. 18 Team Pompiers Igol CMS Motostore also placed inside the overall top ten, meaning four Superstock crews finished among the leading ten after 24 hours.


The Production Trophy crowned its second-ever champion as 13 bikes formed the category’s largest grid of the season. The No. 96 Legacy Competition team sealed its first title by finishing second in class at the Bol d’Or. The No. 199 ARTEC squad, the 2025 champion, ended the year as runner-up, with the No. 16 HTC Racing team completing the championship podium.


Dunlop-backed privateer teams also impressed in the open-tyre Formula EWC class. The No. 6 ERC Endurance team, with Loris Baz, Marcel Schrötter, Kenny Foray and Jan-Ole Jähning, qualified fourth with a 1:51.524 lap, just six tenths off pole, and finished sixth in the final standings on 62 points despite retiring from the race. The No. 14 MACO RACING TEAM recovered from 21st on the grid to finish 8th and end the season 10th, while the No. 53 Mana-au Competition team climbed from 28th to 11th and secured 8th in the final class standings.

David Auerbacher, International Motorcycle Race Event Leader, Dunlop Motorcycle Europe, said, “Congratulations to the 2026 Superstock Trophy and Production Trophy champions, as well as the Dunlop-backed teams in the Formula EWC class that achieved amazing results. We’re proud and happy to have once again supported teams across all categories throughout the year. The Bol d’Or is always a demanding way to close the EWC season and this year was no exception. Across 24 hours, all teams and riders were pushed to their limits, making consistency just as important as outright performance. Seeing our partners fight at the front of the Superstock and Production Trophy fields, while also challenging in Formula EWC, is a great way to end the season. The results across the 2026 season demonstrate how our KR108, KR109 and latest-generation medium front specification meet the demands of our riders.”