Rubber certainly has its role to play in forest landscapes across the world, with natural rubber plantations having risen as a substantial basis of deforestation. One element that addresses deforestation concerns is the correct certification of rubber – be it natural or synthetic. International Sustainability & Carbon Certification (ISCC), a globally leading certification system, works with the objective of providing sustainability solutions for fully traceable and deforestation-free supply chains, inter alia involving the rubber industry. ISCC was one of the presenters at the Tire Technology Expo 2022 at Hannover, Germany, and Dr Jan M Henke, Director, ISCC, threw light on the nitty-gritty of certifications in the rubber industry, their clients in the tyre and rubber industry and more, in an interaction with Tyre Trends.

Can you tell us about your global sustainability scheme?
Our global sustainability and carbon certification scheme has certified companies in more than 100 countries. We certify entire supply chains from farms to plantations and forestry, and also the point of origin of waste and residues, biogenic and fossil waste. This is also covering rubber and natural rubber. Moreover, we cover biogenic waste and residues, including fossil waste, like carbon black, which is, again, used in the rubber industry. We also certify pyrolysis, where recycled mixed plastic waste can help produce synthetic rubber out of the pyrolysis oil. And we certify the entire supply chain, sustainability of raw material.

What is Meo’s role?
Meo initiated ISCC in a multi-stakeholder process a long time ago. It once was a Meo project and went on to become an operations and certification scheme. It was even recognised by the European Commission and some other authorities. It later got segregated from Meo, and ISCC is governed by the ISCC Association with more than 200 members.

So, what role does Meo play in this in case of certification?
Certification is always by independent, third-party certification bodies. ISCC is the standard development. Today’s ISCC was once a project of Meo. It then went on to become independent and operational, and was no longer a project but an individual entity running and further developing and improving the certification scheme.

The operations of the certification system, database, registration, qualification, training programme, integrity programme, the website and all the day-to-day business is done by ISCC. We are currently incorporating 45 certification bodies that are actually doing the on-site audits based on the ISCC standard.

Is ISCC recognised by the European Union?
Yes, it is being used in many sectors, like in bio energy, bio fuel, renewable transport fuels etc. In fact, ISCC is also recognised by the European Commission and by companies based on their sustainability standards and different industry initiatives.

Hence, ISCC is active on a really broad scale, covering different types of raw materials, natural rubber being one of them. We are also covering waste and residues for pyrolysis and their outputs. We then go to all the different end markets, which can be polymers, rubber, tyres, packaging, all types of plastic products, bio energy or any type of renewable fuels, aviation fuels, maritime fuels etc. This is global and is being used in more than 100 countries.

Tyre companies are talking about sustainability, but the larger part of the industry is of small stakeholders, especially in the natural rubber segment, where traceability and accountability are the main issues. How do you see this?
That’s a big challenge, especially in rubber production. At the cultivation level, there are a lot of small holders. There also exist large plantations that are easier to implement and certify. However, it’s definitely a bigger challenge with the small holders; it always depends on how well they are organised, whether there are certain structures, cooperatives or some central units.

Can you tell us about the certification of natural rubber?
The certification of natural rubber is definitely possible. Palm oil is maybe another example where the setup is quite similar sometimes. Also, with respect to the small holders, sometimes the companies are the same. Furthermore, we are very active in the palm oil sector with ISCC. We now also see a demand for natural rubber sustainability certification.

Is there a different process for getting certified in the rubber industry or is it a standard process?
It’s a standard process. It works on plantation. In fact, it works more or less the same as for palm plantations. But you certainly need to make sure that all the small holders reach a certain level, which is difficult. So starting out, bigger plantations may be easier because it’s easier for them to properly prepare for the certification audits. And then, you need to involve more farmers, step by step.

Who decides the standard process to get the certifications?
ISCC develops the standards and the requirements in the multi-stakeholder process. It then comes down to a company saying that it wants to become certified, use ISCC and also make certain claims and communications to its customers and stakeholders. They then reach out to a certification body, that is cooperating with ISCC. Following this, the certification body will do the audit on site – the third-party auditor will also make a decision on the issuance of the certificate.

Can tyre manufacturers get different certifications? For instance, one for natural rubber and another one for synthetic rubber? Or do they get one for all?
If tyre manufacturers source raw material for manufacturing from natural rubber but also synthetic rubber and everything under ISCC, then it’s one audit. Then the auditor would look into aspects of the volume of natural rubber being used that has been certified, although upstream. If one buys from certified suppliers and if the same auditors check, then aspects like the share of the certified synthetic rubber being used, the share of carbon black, etc. are taken into account. And finally, everything can be put together and a certain claim can be made.

Can tyre companies get a separate certificate for natural rubber?
Yes, they can. They can have separate certificates for natural and synthetic rubber both, or even of everything together. As for the final tyre, let’s say, if it’s 20 percent natural rubber and 20 percent synthetic rubber (40 percent of the tyre), then they can make certain sustainability claims on use of sustainable, circular materials etc.

What is the value of a certification?
It’s no deforestation – that’s key when it comes to natural rubber. When you certify, ‘no deforestation’ is the core requirement and deforestation is not allowed under ISCC. It is about additional environmental and social human rights criteria. This fits fine in this part of ISCC’s sustainability standard. And then it’s certainly about traceability in the supply chain, all the way in the end to the final tyre. And if this is established, then you can certainly make claims about the rubber or the final tyre, saying that it has been sustainably produced, based on sustainably sourced raw materials etc.

Plus, if you do this in a smart way, then you can actually cover the natural and synthetic rubber. Natural rubber and synthetic rubber are both very important parts of the final tyre. Both can be covered under ISCC.

Deforestation is a big issue, mainly in Southeast Asian and African countries. How difficult is it to keep an eye on that?
It’s not always easy to handle. Deforestation is not allowed under ISCC; there is a cut-off date of January 2008. If there was deforestation after January 2008, one cannot become certified. However, replanting or a change from palm to rubber is not considered as deforestation.

For example, if you have a palm plantation and if you cut it and plant rubber after 25 years, then that’s not deforestation. That’s just normal replanting.

Also, ISCC is certainly doing assessments, supported by remote sensing. Our core principle is no deforestation, which is very important to ISCC and its stakeholders. ISCC is not just us doing the operations in Cologne; there’s the ISCC Association for the multi-stakeholder dialogue. It has over 200 members from entire supply chains, industries, plantation companies, mineral oil, chemical companies, converters etc. We also have research organisations from different regions involved. In fact, also a number of non-governmental organisations are members of the ISCC Association.

The association meets annually and makes important strategic decisions and elects the ISCC Board. Due to the representation of the research sector and non-governmental organisations, there is quite a good balance of what people want and further development.

Can you tell us about the commercial benefits involved in having a certification?
There is a big value in it. It reduces sustainability risks for companies, helps to establish monitoring, protects the license to operate and has commercial value. For example, the OEMs ask for more sustainable products or lower greenhouse gas emissions. They all have climate neutrality commitments in place and need to start delivering step-by-step now; they need to show what are the activities that they are engaged in and how those improve sustainability in the overall supply chain. Here, ISCC certification can be used.

How do you maintain transparency in certification as a third party?
There is an annual audit. The certificate is valid for one year and then there is a re-certification. The company needs to provide evidence in every re-certification that the rules are being followed. And if they are not, a renewal of the certificates is not possible.

We certainly have quality management and training for companies and the auditors as well, who conduct on-site audits. What’s more, we have our own integrity programmes, where we send out our own auditors. These auditors work for ISCC and double-check the performance of the companies and the work of third-party auditors. Therefore, this integrity programme is key. We have the website where all the certificates are being published and the entire standard is public.

Do you help companies improve their sustainability supply chain?
No, we don’t consult. At ISCC, we are not involved in supporting the companies in order to improve. We have the standard and we conduct the training for companies. The preparation for the audit is not where ISCC is involved; it’s independent from that type of work. And the certification bodies are not allowed to consult in parallel either. ISCC is the independent standard that is used to certify that companies fulfil the sustainability requirements.

What are the other segments that you cover in the tyre industry?
It’s the entire supply chain. Petrochemical industries, tyre manufacturers etc. can all be covered. This also includes everything from plantations to the end product in the tyre industry.

Which is the easiest and the toughest one to certify?
All elements of the supply chain need to be covered.

This can sometimes be a challenge in the beginning, so as to convince your suppliers and also get certified. But, in truth, we have more than 6,000 certificates under ISCC. So there are already a lot of players that have valid certificates, and now this is starting to move into the space of rubber and tyre manufacturers.

Can you tell us about your clients in the rubber and tyre industry?
We have requests from many tyre producers right now. Some producers are certified already. Plus, we have requests for carbon black and first requests for natural rubber. We see the number of requests increasing, and we do have first certificates and first registrations from tyre producers. So we expect this to rise further as the industry needs to show compliance with their sustainability and climate neutrality commitments.

We see the entire tyre industry now targeting sustainability. So how do you find more opportunities and what’s your plan to get more client support?
ISCC started to get really further engaged in the rubber and tyre industry about a year ago; the industry has started understanding the standards, participating in ISCC trainings, joining our stakeholder events etc. Therefore, step by step, they got to know ISCC better and what it could do for them. They have now even started to get involved and do certifications, including reaching out all the way to the cultivation of natural rubber.

Are you going to focus on the Asian market?
Yes. In fact, we already have a few hundred certificates in Malaysia, Indonesia and other countries in the region. These markets are truly important. Our other key markets are North America and Europe, while we are also active in Africa and South America.

We are, eventually, trying to do more and convince people to become certified, show compliance to sustainability requirements, engage in a continuous improvement approach to become more sustainable and then allow manufacturers to really make claims.  

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

India’s retreading industry closes 2025 on a turbulent note, shaped by volatile demand, uneven GST reforms, rising compliance costs and a partial enforcement of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime.

The year began with optimism as pre-cured tread (PCT) sales moved up on the back of growing radialisation and sustained awareness initiatives, but that momentum faded mid-year as policy shifts and softer fleet sentiments weighed down volumes. Retreading companies say 2025 has been defined as much by regulatory shocks as by the struggle to recover pricing power in an increasingly competitive market.

According to Tyre Retreading and Education Association Chairman, Karun Sangi, overall retreading volumes declined through 2025, especially for businesses dependent on larger fleets. Fleet operators delayed retreading cycles as freight movement stayed inconsistent and as the widening GST gap altered cost economics.

Sangi explained that the GST cut on new tractor tyres from 28 percent to 18 percent dramatically changed fleet behaviour. “When the GST on new tractor tyres fell by 10 percentage points, it became easier and cheaper for fleet owners and small operators to opt for new tyres rather than retreading them. This has impacted retreading volumes significantly.”

Retreading GST remains at 18 percent, creating a distortion that disproportionately hurts small farmers and rural operators who traditionally preferred retreaded tyres for cost savings.

Sangi noted that radialisation in the truck and bus segment continued expanding, but many fleets still hesitate to pay for high-quality PCTR material. He stated, “There is a mindset shift that is still incomplete. Radial tyres require proper retreading practices and quality material to deliver full casing life. But many fleet owners still focus only on upfront cost.”

This behaviour forced retreaders to hold pricing steady even as raw material costs rose through the year. Smaller retreaders, lacking scale, were hit hardest, resulting in thinning margins across the industry.

Another major stressor was the implementation of the EPR framework for end-of-life tyres. According to Sangi, the EPR system, although essential for environmental compliance, has created bottlenecks for smaller players.

“EPR has made processes slower, approvals tighter and paperwork heavier. The industry agrees with the intent, but implementation needs streamlining, or SMEs will not survive,” he said.  

Retreaders who buy used casings from dealers or fleets now face documentation challenges and ambiguous compliance norms, particularly when handling multi-state movements of scrap tyres.

Sangi emphasised that retreaders have long been part of the circular economy and over-regulation could undermine a segment that inherently extends tyre life and reduces waste.

Treads in disarray

Echoing similar concerns, Kolkata-based Supreme Treads’ Director, Rajesh Verma, said that 2025 has been a difficult year marked by falling demand and rising input costs. He pointed to weak commercial vehicle movement, especially in the long-haul trucking segment, as a key factor.

“When truck utilisation drops, tyre wear drops. That automatically delays retreading cycles and that’s exactly what we saw in 2025,” he explained. Verma added that patchy freight during monsoons and the prolonged slowdown in construction activity further reduced tyre consumption.

Verma highlighted that customers also shifted back towards new tyres due to aggressive discounting by OEMs and Tier-II tyre brands. According to him, “We noticed that many smaller fleets were offered attractive upfront prices for new tyres, almost matching retread economics. For them, the choice became simpler.”

This price war undermined retreaders’ ability to raise rates despite increases in rubber, carbon black and labour costs. He reiterated that while overall radialisation is good for long-term industry health, retread quality across India remains inconsistent because of unorganised operators offering low-priced, low-quality jobs.

One of the leading tread makers of the country, Indag Rubber, echoed the same sentiment. The company’s Senior General Manager Rohit Kapoor said, “Since the start of CY2025, the industry witnessed an uptick in pre-cured tread demand, driven by greater customer awareness around the operational and environmental benefits of retreading. The rising commercial adoption of radial TBR tyres further encouraged fleet operators to opt for retreading as a way to extend tyre life and reduce running costs. However, the September GST reform proved to be a setback: while the tax on new tyres was reduced, the rate on retreaded tyres remained unchanged. This narrowed the price advantage and caused market volumes to fluctuate, although we expect a gradual recovery and steady growth in the coming year.”

He added, “The retreading sector had anticipated that the industry would be included in the GST revisions, given its role in circularity and resource efficiency. We have consistently engaged with policymakers to advocate for a lower tax rate on retreaded tyres and services, in line with global sustainability goals and waste-tyre regulations. Discussions with the authorities are ongoing, and while no formal roadmap has been communicated yet, we remain confident that the policy direction will eventually align with circular-economy principles and support tax rationalisation for retreading.”

2026 Outlook

Both Sangi and Verma agree that despite 2025’s setbacks, the long-term fundamentals of retreading remain strong because India’s expanding logistics and transportation ecosystem will continue to rely on cost-efficient tyre lifecycle management.

Sangi stressed that the industry needs GST rationalisation and smoother EPR processes. Verma added that technology adoption will be crucial for regaining customer trust and delivering consistent performance across applications.

As the year ends, the industry finds itself at an inflection point as the demand turbulence of 2025 exposed structural issues but also clarified what retreaders must prioritise in 2026 viz-a-viz quality, compliance readiness, customer education and tighter collaboration with fleet operators.

The segment has weathered a difficult year, but its intrinsic value proposition of extending tyre life at one-third the cost of a new tyre remains compelling. India’s push for sustainability and rising pressure on operating costs could well reposition retreading as a growth industry again, provided policy and market forces move in alignment.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Tyres Europe has responded to the European Commission’s recently presented Automotive Simplification Package. While acknowledging the proposal as an initial positive step towards reducing regulatory complexity, the association identifies a significant omission: the failure to address the regulatory regime governing tyres. According to the association, tyres are a fundamental component influencing vehicle safety, energy efficiency, noise and emissions, making their inclusion in any regulatory simplification effort essential.

The association welcomes the Package’s move away from redundant laboratory testing, noting this sensible approach recognises that proliferating tests increases cost without necessarily improving environmental or safety outcomes. However, it argues this logic must be applied consistently across all vehicle components, including tyres. A specific and immediate opportunity for simplification is highlighted concerning the Implementing Act on In-Service Verification for heavy-duty vehicle emissions. The association points out that new original-equipment tyres used in this testing are already rigorously certified under separate, existing tyre legislation. The new act imposes stricter tolerances, creating a scenario where tyres fully compliant with their specific regulations could fail the in-service test. This constitutes a disproportionate double regulation that undermines legal certainty for manufacturers. The association contends that the objectives of in-service verification could be met more effectively through reinforced market surveillance instead of creating a parallel regulatory regime.

Looking forward, Tyres Europe calls for a coherent regulatory framework that properly acknowledges the tyre’s essential role. This framework should formally recognise tyres as core safety components, introduce new requirements with clarity and predictability, base decisions on reliable data and support innovation, circularity and European manufacturing. The association concludes that significant industry investment in safer and more sustainable products depends on regulatory confidence. For Europe to maintain a resilient and competitive automotive industry, tyre policy must be fully integrated into regulatory design, ensuring tyres are visible in policy discussions and recognised for their critical contribution to sustainable mobility.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Doublestar Tire secured two major honours at the 2025 World Executive Summit in Hong Kong, an event organised by the World Brand Lab. The company was celebrated as the premier brand in its field, receiving the Chinese Brand of the Year award for the tyre category.

This accolade was complemented by a separate recognition, as Doublestar Tire was also ranked among China’s Top 10 Most Influential Brands for the same category in the 2025 edition of the annual listing.

These awards, announced during the summit, highlight the brand's leading reputation and substantial impact within the competitive Chinese market.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd.'s global flagship ADVAN tyres are prominently featured in the latest high-octane instalment of the Gymkhana film series, ‘Gymkhana: Aussie Shred’. Released by Hoonigan Media Machine, the video rapidly surpassed 5.3 million views within its first week. This marks the third consecutive film in the popular stunt-driving series to showcase Yokohama’s tyre technology, following previous episodes released in 2020 and 2022 which have collectively amassed tens of millions of views online.

The film stars action sports icon and Yokohama brand ambassador Travis Pastrana, who performs a series of extreme manoeuvres across Australian terrain. His vehicle is a custom-built, 670-horsepower Subaru ‘Brataroo’, a modern re-engineering of a classic 1978 model specifically designed for Gymkhana stunts. Pastrana’s daring feats include high-speed drifts and a breathtaking 50-metre canyon jump, all captured in the new production.

Supporting these demanding performances, the Brataroo is equipped with Yokohama’s 18-inch ADVAN A052 street sports tyres and ADVAN APEX V601 high-performance tyres. Engineered to deliver an optimal blend of grip and structural integrity, these tyres provided critical stability across varied and punishing surfaces, from race circuits to loose gravel. This technological partnership enabled Pastrana to successfully execute the film's next-level stunts, demonstrating the ADVAN line's capabilities under extreme driving conditions and reinforcing Yokohama’s association with premier motorsport entertainment.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!