Sustainability is a vague idea. How do you define sustainability in the natural rubber sector?

I think sustainability is vague if you have not looked at it with a good set of eyes. If you see it as a concept, then it certainly is not vague. Many standards have been introduced in the last 30 years and organisations and stakeholders have worked around this concept. The sustainability concept is evolving and is very well defined in the areas we operate in nowadays.

GPSNR defines sustainability through a multi-stakeholder process where we bring in members of GPSNR together. Our organisation represents all parts of the supply chain, from smallholders to processors and traders to manufacturers and civil society. Today, we represent about 60 percent of the global natural rubber volume.

Our supply chain sustainability commitments include the environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. The definition of sustainability for our members is now very well defined through a document, which is approved and called the policy framework document. This is a set of eight overarching themes that include commitments to legal compliance, community livelihoods, healthy and functioning ecosystems (including no deforestation) and respecting all human rights. Our GPSNR members need to have policies aligned for the production and procurement of sustainable natural rubber.

The great news is that after the document was approved last year, the GPSNR members are now aligning and publishing policies to be in line with this framework. Of course, these are commitments that do not explicitly mean implementation. Now the next step for us would be reporting requirements for our members. The members will have to publish reports every year, and we are defining the requirements for these reports now. For them,           it will be to demonstrate how they are reaching this commitment. We are also working on implementation guidance that will help companies implement an assurance model. It aims to understand the different risks and identify the modes of assurance based on the level of risk. It ensures that the commitments are met and that any claim the company makes on sustainability is verified.

Would there be any mechanism to know how companies are implementing the policies?

For GPSNR, it is not about reinventing the wheel. We don't want to create another certification standard. We have certification systems out there. I think, especially in the rubber sector, we need something that goes a bit broader than the current specification for certification because we have 85 percent production coming from independent smallholders, owning 1-2 hectares of land each, which makes it quite challenging to scale up certification promptly. So we are building up an assurance model, which is going to be a risk basis. The basic idea behind this is that instead of having a standard where you have to tick all the boxes of the standard, we will look at your situation. We are going to have a map of risk globally. So, based on the level of risk, we ask our members to have different levels of assurance.

For example, if we are sourcing from a place where everything was developed years ago, your risk of deforestation might be low. We might not require you to do a full deforestation assessment. Or maybe your risk in the supply chain is very high in terms of labour with migrants; we will ask you to have a more in-depth and third party assessment for that.

And this way, we hope to be able to bring down the cost of assurance and make the process a bit linear so that we can focus on what matters.

GPSNR was established in 2019. Could you highlight the achievements of GPSNR so far?

We are quite a young organisation considering it is a multi-stakeholder organisation. We started with just 11 members.  , we soon had 16-17 members, including some processors and traders in automotive, but now we are reaching 130 members.

As mentioned earlier, today, our members represent well above 50 percent of the global rubber market volume. Even if you compare it to other similar organisations with long-standing in other commodities, we are far above what others have seen in terms of representation. One of the most significant achievements that I would mention is the policy framework and its commitments and the ability to align the members with it to make a difference in the natural rubber supply chain.

I feel very confident that through this change, we will be able to reach the smallholders and improve their situation, which is really at the heart of GPSNR.

How do you make sure that there will be traceability and transparency in case of violation of rights?

That's a fair point. One of the key things that we managed to ensure is that smallholders are included in decision making in GPSNR processes. So now we have 28 smallholders that represent 8  different countries at the moment. They're a part of GPSNR as members, but they don't pay any fees.

They have been selected the representatives  through workshops conducted by us. Several smallholders participated in the workshops, and I do think that we're trying our utmost to ensure that their participation is meaningful. They understand how to engage in the platform and how to make their voice heard within the platform.

We ensure that everything GPSNR is doing is co-designed with smallholders. I don't mean to say that we represent all the seven million smallholders out there, but we're making strides as much as possible.

In terms of the grievances, we have set up a grievance mechanism that is open and transparent. Any stakeholder now can file complaints through GPSNR, and an independent panel of experts would review this. We hope to ensure that there is at least a communication channel and ways to address discrepancies through that system.

I think traceability can be defined in very different ways. So, traceability, in my mind, is knowing from where a specific batch of rubber is coming and keeping it separate from others in the supply chain.There is some merit to that and some approaches to do a certification. We need to look at transparency to ensure that companies know where we are sourcing from. They have to take responsibility for their suppliers' operations as if it was their operations.

What are the steps undertaken by GPSNR to curb illegal activities of companies like land grabbing etc.?

I think the first and most crucial step is to identify what can and cannot be done, because, unfortunately, in developing countries, maybe at times, the legal requirements do not match with the social licence to operate requirements expected in the sustainable world. That's one aspect, and there's also the enforcement, and due diligence might not be as good as expected. So, I don't think that the policy framework of GPSNR does a very good job in identifying what those do's and don'ts are. As for GPSNR members, I do believe strongly that the policies that are now in place will set a good foundation to ensure that the buyers will trigger these requirements down the supply chain.

We have seen that due diligence can only stop deforestation and land grabbing and other such activities in the entire supply chain to some extent. What we need is incentives, and that's why one of the critical challenges that we're finding in GPSNR is to identify how we can bring up financial and non-financial  incentives to companies and smallholders to operate sustainably.

For example, we have a working group on shared responsibility looking at how the companies can act together to solve issues that cannot be solved by a single company on its own. I deeply believe that most of these issues are linked to livelihood. May be we need to ensure that they get the right amount of compensation for their rubber production so that they don't have to open up another hectare to meet their livelihoods requirements.

Would you be working with the government in different countries? How difficult is it to work with the government?

GPSNR does not have direct government involvement, but we do collaborate with them. We have an MoU with IRSG, the international rubber research organisation. So by working with them, we have set up a series of dialogues with governments where we brought up, in the past year, the work of GPSNR, seeking opportunities to collaborate.

We are in touch with the local government agencies to ensure that we have public and private partnerships. Governments are key stakeholders, and especially when we want to reach smallholders at a large scale, we cannot forget to ensure that the governments are involved in the work we do.

Nineteen leading companies have joined your organisation. How difficult do you find it to make standard solutions?

Well, that's the beauty of the multi-state process and co-design process. So, it took a while, but the policy framework was designed with the input of all members. Everyone had the chance to chip in and find a synergistic approach together with the civil society organisations.

I think it's also doable as the world is becoming more global. There are differences in how the companies operate, but the global expectations are quite clear to everyone and every company as all aim to become global leaders. And that has helped in aligning the expectations.

You have around 130 members at present. How do you want to expand?

Until now, the membership that we've seen coming in is mostly from within the tyre sector. We are having discussions and interest from potential members outside the tyre sector but still in the rubber sector. Our setup already allows for the inclusion of known tyre members, but we're not just a tyre-focused association; we are a natural rubber-focused association. So the door is open for these entities, which is the focus of our expansion.

What are the challenges?

Covid has not been easy, but in a multi-stakeholder organisation, we're trying to build trust among our members for them to work together. We are human, so we're social animals, and trust is created by having interactions. So building trust has been really challenging.

But I do hope that as we come out of this crisis, this becomes easier for us as we want to reinstate physical gatherings and get our members together, which will help us move faster than we are today.

As part of a strategic effort to increase its presence in the region's premium original equipment (OE) market, Kumho Tire has confirmed its plans to establish its first tyre production facility in Europe by 2027.

The company has shortlisted Poland, Serbia and Portugal as possible locations for the plant, which is projected to need an investment of more than KRW1 trillion (USD 705 million). The decision is closely linked to Kumho’s ambition to strengthen its partnerships with European automakers and was revealed by Kumho Tire CEO during the South Korean premiere of Kumho's new Ecsta Sport tyre line.

Kumho has recently secured OE supply contracts with major brands such as Mercedes-Benz, BMW and Volkswagen Group. At the moment, Kumho runs eight tyre production plants in China, Vietnam, South Korea and the US. Its capacity to compete in the premium OE market, however, has come to be perceived as being constrained by the absence of a European production base. Through the benefits of local production, the new facility will improve response to European client requests, save freight costs and shorten delivery times, all of which will strengthen the company's partnerships.

Sentury Tire USA has opened pre-enrolment for its two associate dealer programmes (ADPs), the Delinte HYPERDRIVE Associate Dealer Program and the Landsail Elyte Associate Dealer Program, underscoring the company’s commitment to rewarding dedication and partnership to the Landsail and Delinte brands.

The ADPs, which are customised for each brand and intended to encourage dealers, will formally start on 1 June 2025. Both programmes give dealers access to special benefits, incentives and strong tools to help them expand their businesses. This involves dependable customer service, effective marketing and worthwhile financial incentives to promote dealers' success at every stage.

Beginning in Q3, dealers may earn up to USD three per tyre through the Delinte HYPERDRIVE Associate Dealer Program. Dealers can receive retroactive benefits for purchases completed in Q2 if they register before 1 June. The awards are available for all Delinte PTR, LTR and the new DV3 LMD AS last-mile delivery tyres. For all Landsail PTR and LTR tyres, independent dealers that sign up for the Landsail Elyte Associate Dealer Program can also earn up to USD three per tyre. For customers who sign up by June 1, the new LMD 100 AS last-mile delivery is also eligible for the benefits and will get the same early bird incentive for Q2 2025.

No initial order is necessary. Dealers only need to register to begin making money. According to the monthly programme rewards structure, 48 tyre purchases each month are eligible for a reward of USD one per tyre, 120 tyres are eligible for a reward of USD two per tyre and 240 or more tyres are eligible for a reward of USD three per tyre.

ENSO, a London-based tyre manufacturer engaged in the production of sustainable tyres specially designed for electric vehicles (EVs), has launched its new ENSO Premium range of EV-specific ultra-high-performance (UHP) tyres aimed at drivers of high-performance EVs such as the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y.

Specifically designed for electric passenger vehicles, the ENSO Premium range comes with A/A EU-label ratings for both energy efficiency and wet grip. The tyres are designed to provide safety, increased range and a reduced total cost of ownership. Conventional tyre designs frequently fall short of the special performance needs of electric vehicles, which include greater vehicle weight, regenerative braking and higher torque loads. By lowering tyre wear and rolling resistance, ENSO Premium takes care of these issues.

The company is an authorised provider of replacement tyres for LEVC's electric taxis and has partnered with Uber to install its tyres in high-mileage metropolitan areas. The company now plans to grow throughout Europe and North America, and with ENSO Premium, it is now offering its services to individual EV owners throughout the United Kingdom. According to ENSO, the range offers advantages including longer tyre life and fewer replacements, lower energy usage, fewer charging stops and lower CO₂ emissions and tyre particle pollution.

Gunnlaugur Erlendsson, CEO and Co-Founder, ENSO, said, “We’re plugging a long-standing gap in the tyre market by offering EV drivers a purpose-built, affordable, premium EV tyre alternative that matches the innovation of their EV.”

Kraton Corporation, a leading global sustainable producer of specialty polymers and high-value bio-based products derived from pine wood pulping co-products, has announced a general price hike in North America for its SBS, SIS and HSBC product lines with effect from 1 May 2025.

Following a careful analysis of the effects of recently implemented tariffs, related cost increases and a conclusion that the company cannot independently absorb these repercussions, Kraton is adopting these pricing hikes, according to a company statement. The company further said that it will keep an eye on the scene and reassess these measures promptly in the event that conditions and US import tariffs alter.