Sustainability is a vague idea. How do you define sustainability in the natural rubber sector?
I think sustainability is vague if you have not looked at it with a good set of eyes. If you see it as a concept, then it certainly is not vague. Many standards have been introduced in the last 30 years and organisations and stakeholders have worked around this concept. The sustainability concept is evolving and is very well defined in the areas we operate in nowadays.
GPSNR defines sustainability through a multi-stakeholder process where we bring in members of GPSNR together. Our organisation represents all parts of the supply chain, from smallholders to processors and traders to manufacturers and civil society. Today, we represent about 60 percent of the global natural rubber volume.
Our supply chain sustainability commitments include the environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainability. The definition of sustainability for our members is now very well defined through a document, which is approved and called the policy framework document. This is a set of eight overarching themes that include commitments to legal compliance, community livelihoods, healthy and functioning ecosystems (including no deforestation) and respecting all human rights. Our GPSNR members need to have policies aligned for the production and procurement of sustainable natural rubber.
The great news is that after the document was approved last year, the GPSNR members are now aligning and publishing policies to be in line with this framework. Of course, these are commitments that do not explicitly mean implementation. Now the next step for us would be reporting requirements for our members. The members will have to publish reports every year, and we are defining the requirements for these reports now. For them, it will be to demonstrate how they are reaching this commitment. We are also working on implementation guidance that will help companies implement an assurance model. It aims to understand the different risks and identify the modes of assurance based on the level of risk. It ensures that the commitments are met and that any claim the company makes on sustainability is verified.
Would there be any mechanism to know how companies are implementing the policies?
For GPSNR, it is not about reinventing the wheel. We don't want to create another certification standard. We have certification systems out there. I think, especially in the rubber sector, we need something that goes a bit broader than the current specification for certification because we have 85 percent production coming from independent smallholders, owning 1-2 hectares of land each, which makes it quite challenging to scale up certification promptly. So we are building up an assurance model, which is going to be a risk basis. The basic idea behind this is that instead of having a standard where you have to tick all the boxes of the standard, we will look at your situation. We are going to have a map of risk globally. So, based on the level of risk, we ask our members to have different levels of assurance.
For example, if we are sourcing from a place where everything was developed years ago, your risk of deforestation might be low. We might not require you to do a full deforestation assessment. Or maybe your risk in the supply chain is very high in terms of labour with migrants; we will ask you to have a more in-depth and third party assessment for that.
And this way, we hope to be able to bring down the cost of assurance and make the process a bit linear so that we can focus on what matters.
GPSNR was established in 2019. Could you highlight the achievements of GPSNR so far?
We are quite a young organisation considering it is a multi-stakeholder organisation. We started with just 11 members. , we soon had 16-17 members, including some processors and traders in automotive, but now we are reaching 130 members.
As mentioned earlier, today, our members represent well above 50 percent of the global rubber market volume. Even if you compare it to other similar organisations with long-standing in other commodities, we are far above what others have seen in terms of representation. One of the most significant achievements that I would mention is the policy framework and its commitments and the ability to align the members with it to make a difference in the natural rubber supply chain.
I feel very confident that through this change, we will be able to reach the smallholders and improve their situation, which is really at the heart of GPSNR.
How do you make sure that there will be traceability and transparency in case of violation of rights?
That's a fair point. One of the key things that we managed to ensure is that smallholders are included in decision making in GPSNR processes. So now we have 28 smallholders that represent 8 different countries at the moment. They're a part of GPSNR as members, but they don't pay any fees.
They have been selected the representatives through workshops conducted by us. Several smallholders participated in the workshops, and I do think that we're trying our utmost to ensure that their participation is meaningful. They understand how to engage in the platform and how to make their voice heard within the platform.
We ensure that everything GPSNR is doing is co-designed with smallholders. I don't mean to say that we represent all the seven million smallholders out there, but we're making strides as much as possible.
In terms of the grievances, we have set up a grievance mechanism that is open and transparent. Any stakeholder now can file complaints through GPSNR, and an independent panel of experts would review this. We hope to ensure that there is at least a communication channel and ways to address discrepancies through that system.
I think traceability can be defined in very different ways. So, traceability, in my mind, is knowing from where a specific batch of rubber is coming and keeping it separate from others in the supply chain.There is some merit to that and some approaches to do a certification. We need to look at transparency to ensure that companies know where we are sourcing from. They have to take responsibility for their suppliers' operations as if it was their operations.
What are the steps undertaken by GPSNR to curb illegal activities of companies like land grabbing etc.?
I think the first and most crucial step is to identify what can and cannot be done, because, unfortunately, in developing countries, maybe at times, the legal requirements do not match with the social licence to operate requirements expected in the sustainable world. That's one aspect, and there's also the enforcement, and due diligence might not be as good as expected. So, I don't think that the policy framework of GPSNR does a very good job in identifying what those do's and don'ts are. As for GPSNR members, I do believe strongly that the policies that are now in place will set a good foundation to ensure that the buyers will trigger these requirements down the supply chain.
We have seen that due diligence can only stop deforestation and land grabbing and other such activities in the entire supply chain to some extent. What we need is incentives, and that's why one of the critical challenges that we're finding in GPSNR is to identify how we can bring up financial and non-financial incentives to companies and smallholders to operate sustainably.
For example, we have a working group on shared responsibility looking at how the companies can act together to solve issues that cannot be solved by a single company on its own. I deeply believe that most of these issues are linked to livelihood. May be we need to ensure that they get the right amount of compensation for their rubber production so that they don't have to open up another hectare to meet their livelihoods requirements.
Would you be working with the government in different countries? How difficult is it to work with the government?
GPSNR does not have direct government involvement, but we do collaborate with them. We have an MoU with IRSG, the international rubber research organisation. So by working with them, we have set up a series of dialogues with governments where we brought up, in the past year, the work of GPSNR, seeking opportunities to collaborate.
We are in touch with the local government agencies to ensure that we have public and private partnerships. Governments are key stakeholders, and especially when we want to reach smallholders at a large scale, we cannot forget to ensure that the governments are involved in the work we do.
Nineteen leading companies have joined your organisation. How difficult do you find it to make standard solutions?
Well, that's the beauty of the multi-state process and co-design process. So, it took a while, but the policy framework was designed with the input of all members. Everyone had the chance to chip in and find a synergistic approach together with the civil society organisations.
I think it's also doable as the world is becoming more global. There are differences in how the companies operate, but the global expectations are quite clear to everyone and every company as all aim to become global leaders. And that has helped in aligning the expectations.
You have around 130 members at present. How do you want to expand?
Until now, the membership that we've seen coming in is mostly from within the tyre sector. We are having discussions and interest from potential members outside the tyre sector but still in the rubber sector. Our setup already allows for the inclusion of known tyre members, but we're not just a tyre-focused association; we are a natural rubber-focused association. So the door is open for these entities, which is the focus of our expansion.
What are the challenges?
Covid has not been easy, but in a multi-stakeholder organisation, we're trying to build trust among our members for them to work together. We are human, so we're social animals, and trust is created by having interactions. So building trust has been really challenging.
But I do hope that as we come out of this crisis, this becomes easier for us as we want to reinstate physical gatherings and get our members together, which will help us move faster than we are today.
Tegeta Green Planet And Shine Energy Inspire Eco-Responsibility In Young Learners
- By TT News
- May 23, 2026
Tegeta Green Planet and Shine Energy, both affiliated with Tegeta Holding, have launched a joint educational initiative to raise environmental awareness and a sense of responsibility among young people. The project addresses modern challenges such as environmental protection and sustainable development.
Company representatives are visiting schools across Tbilisi to hold informational meetings, presentations and workshops. The programme begins with presentations, followed by interactive games and activities designed to help students retain the information. At the end of each session, participants receive symbolic gifts and prizes as motivation.
Tegeta Green Planet focuses on teaching students the principles of specific waste management, including how to properly handle used tyres, batteries and oils. The sessions explain why proper waste management is essential for environmental protection and how it connects to the circular economy. Meanwhile, Shine Energy educates young people on the importance of energy, its everyday use and why developing renewable and sustainable energy resources is crucial.
The initiative is not limited to schools. In the near future, both organisations will expand their efforts to universities, aiming to broaden awareness about environmental protection, waste management and energy efficiency. The ultimate goal is to foster environmentally responsible attitudes among the younger generation, helping build a more sustainable and conscious society.
Zeon Earns Top Supplier Engagement Rating From CDP For First Time
- By TT News
- May 22, 2026
Zeon has been recognised as a Supplier Engagement Leader in the 2025 Supplier Engagement Assessment (SEA) conducted by CDP, a United Kingdom-based international environmental nonprofit organisation. This achievement represents the first time the company has received the highest possible rating in this assessment.
The evaluation measures how corporations address climate change within their supply chains, focusing on responses to the CDP Climate Change Questionnaire across five critical areas. These include governance, emissions targets, Scope 3 emissions management, risk management and overall supplier engagement strategies.
Zeon earned the top rating for its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through supplier collaboration, a group-wide initiative, alongside continuous dialogue maintained via procurement activities. Guided by its philosophy of contributing to planetary preservation and human prosperity, Zeon remains committed to sustainable management. The company reaffirmed that it will continue working with suppliers and other stakeholders to tackle climate change and meet societal expectations.
WACKER Announces Price Hike For Resins, Dispersions And Dispersible Polymer Powders
- By TT News
- May 22, 2026
German chemical group WACKER has announced a price increase of up to 15 percent for its resins, dispersions and dispersible polymer powders produced at its European and US facilities. The adjustment takes effect on 1 June 2026, or as existing customer contracts permit. The move is designed to allow the company’s Polymers division to maintain high product quality, deliver technological innovations and provide superior customer service and technical support. It will also support investments aimed at securing future growth in key markets.
Rising costs for raw materials and logistics have forced the pricing measure, with the Polymers division being particularly affected. The recent conflict in the Middle East has caused significant disruptions across global commodity markets. As a direct result, prices for energy, raw materials and transportation have climbed sharply.
Despite the increase, WACKER remains focused on sustaining its commitment to customer support and long-term capability. The company underscored that the adjustment is necessary to continue meeting market demands while ensuring operational stability and future-oriented development across its focus markets.
- Pirelli North America
- Closed-Loop Tyre Recycling Initiative
- Tire Recycling Foundation
- Bolder Industries
Pirelli North America Launches First Closed-Loop Tyre Recycling Initiative
- By TT News
- May 22, 2026
Pirelli North America has launched its first closed-loop circular recycling initiative, marking a significant step in the company’s broader strategy to increase recycled and bio‑based content in its tyre production. The project has received the Tire Recycling Foundation’s Value Chain Collaboration Award.
The programme recovers scrap tyres generated during Pirelli’s own North American manufacturing process. These materials are sent to Bolder Industries, which applies ISCC PLUS‑certified pyrolysis technology to produce BolderBlack recovered carbon black. Pirelli then reintroduces this material into new tyre production at its North American facilities, partially replacing virgin carbon black. The effort is part of a wider Pirelli plan to expand such industrial ecosystems across the group’s production network, aiming to valorise waste by reintegrating recovered materials into tyre manufacturing.
Beyond the award, the initiative reflects Pirelli’s broader circularity approach, which includes ongoing work to boost recycled and bio‑based material usage. The company targets over 80 percent bio‑based and recycled content in its best‑performing products and forty percent in total production by 2030.
Claudio Zanardo, CEO, Pirelli North America, said, "The Rome plant is one of the most technologically advanced manufacturing facilities in Pirelli. This initiative reflects an approach focused on increasing the use of recovered materials within existing production processes. It is part of a broader effort to gradually integrate raw materials derived from recycled resources into our products while maintaining consistency in performance and quality."
Tony Wibbeler, CEO, Bolder Industries, said, "Our collaboration demonstrates that a traceable, mass-balance approach to tyre-to-tyre circularity is not only achievable, but it's ready to scale inside a premium manufacturing environment, meeting real performance and certification requirements at every step. This is the kind of progress the industry has been working toward for many years."


Comments (0)
ADD COMMENT