In human mobility, tyres are ‘the only contact between the vehicle and road’, to make people move from one point to another ‘safely’.

In land cargo transportation, they are the ‘work horse’ of the supply chain for any goods, whether industrial (raw material) or finished goods. In special applications such as mining, they are ‘mimicking’ pipelines in the oil and gas industry, such as piping where hydraulic pumps replaced by truck engines.

So tyres play a ‘critical role’ in transporting almost anything: ‘people and goods’ when we must deliver on land transport mode.

The challenges: Too many options

Its vital role is not questionable. But having that critical role doesn’t mean it’s easy to handle for the end user.
Why?

In the case of tyres, we know premium brands, regional brands and sometimes local brands. The classic question is: which one is the best?

For personal purposes (PCR), a decision could be made easily with the risk of losing a small amount of money. Simply fitting a tyre according to OEM standards will not be a big issue. The problem arises with fleet companies (trucking or bus) with tens, hundreds or even thousands of units of equipment.

Even riskier when it comes to OTR tyres, where prices can reach tens of dollars or more. It is not easy to pick which one is the best.

How to choose the most suitable tyre for operations?

In order to get the right choice, we must do the following:

1. Define performance indicators: Productivity or efficiency -  Regarding commercial tyres (TB/AG/OTR/IND), performance is defined as productivity and efficiency. These two elements are sometimes aligned and sometimes contradictory.

Which one should be chosen?

It depends on the company’s goal or situation. We must optimise between those two so that it becomes ‘business decision’ and not a solely ‘tyre technical decision’. When productivity takes the lead compared to efficiency

One fleet of 120T giant trucks fitted with 27.00R49 has limitations due to the TKPH caused mainly by long distances, so the real site TKPH is quite high. It limits trucks operating cycles to only 6.5 per shift. It is only transporting coal at 120 T/cycle x 6 cycles = 720 T per shift, while the end user burns fuel without getting tonnage in return for a half cycle.

In this situation, the end user is not sensitive to efficiency; they are more sensitive to how to increase productivity.

When efficiency becomes the driver instead of productivity

The other situation is that coal transporters have problems with tyre costs due to inefficient tyre usage. The end user thinks they made a good choice using the 12.00R24 *** (three-star) rating. They expect a long life, but the outcome is the opposite. Testing was done with bias tyres (12.00-24), 18PR and 20PR. Comparison testing was done for six months, and in the end, we concluded bias tyres were more efficient than radial tyres.

The explanation for why bias tyres perform better than radial tyres comes from a pressure check done with 1,500 points of data show ‘intentional’ pressure reduction.

When it was discussed with site management and the driver, the driver told management that the hauling road was undulating, forcing them to reduce pressure. If they don’t reduce pressure, they will suffer from back pain.

So in terms of truck load, it is not overload, but in terms of tyres, it becomes overload due to low pressure. As bias tyres use nylon as the carcass, they have more resistance to fatigue, whereas radial tyres using steel cord have less resistance to fatigue and are more prone to premature failure.

The common sayings that radial is better than bias, premium is better than normal brand and thicker tread is better than shallow tread are more myths than realities. It all depends on the requirements coming from the field/ operations.

2. Optimise tyre life

The only way to do this is the end user doing an assessment of their requirements for each application, operating condition and site/road condition. This way, they could be able to build up the tyre requirements and externalise their requirement to get the most suitable tyre specification from whichever brand and whichever type of tyres.

With tyre OEMs mostly developing products for the most common applications, the potential performance is not necessarily the best performance on every site, independent of the brand, tyre type etc.

The best suggestion for the end user and OEMs

OEMs should start Co-Creation Value by having close communication from the beginning about actual customer requirements and focusing on creating the most suitable solution rather than the most common approach.

How it becomes practical If fleet truck customers have more than 1,000 trucks and mining customers have at least 100 giant trucks, they would like to have the most suitable product rather than the most common product for their application, as their tyre cost will be significant to gain their attention.

Meanwhile, for OEMs, it is worth to develop tyres with the most suitable solution and treat the customer as Key Account.

How to measure the benefits for each party

For the end user, the more suitable the tyre, the more optimum tyre performance they will have. For OEMs, the measurement is quite simple: calculating the potential life-time value (LTV) of a customer (estimate revenue generated from this customer) compared to the cost-time value (CTV) of the customer (the spending on developing products and maintaining relationship with the customer).

And if LTV/CTV > 1, it is an Attractive Customer. If the estimated LTV/CTV is not attractive enough to be handled, the OEM could focus on another customer.

Summary

• Tyre optimisation for end-user applications is a fair measure, and the actual performance indicator aligns with the temporary business objectives of the end-user that could change over time; one time it will be more productivity focused, the other time it may be efficiency focus.
• Democratisation and an open field for the whole OEM player that is not dogmatised as premium always being better, radial always being better or star rating always being better. It is merely how end-users could define their operational requirements and work together as cocreators with certain OEMs.
• It is not necessary for OEMs to chase all market segments; each OEM could choose where they will be more competitive than others. Meanwhile, for the end-user, they will get high-quality and reliable service from certain OEMs on their tyre usage.

Representational image courtesy: cebmumbai/Facebook

The author is an engineering expert in the mining and truck tyres field. 
The column was first published in August-September 2023 issue of Tyre Trends.

Bridgestone Americas announced the launch of Firestone Direct mobile vehicle service for car owners and fleet operators. Firestone Direct brings Bridgestone’s automotive services directly to vehicle owners’ homes or workplaces to offer maximum convenience with safe, contact-free service.

This service uses specially equipped vans operated by certified technicians to perform a wide range of maintenance services, including fluid and filter changes, tire repair and replacement, battery check and replacement, and more. 

Through 2021, Firestone Direct will continue to grow into additional markets across the southeastern U.S., with plans to expand nationwide by 2023. The new service launched first in Nashville and Atlanta and expanded into Orlando and Tampa in March.

Angie Oleson, director of Firestone Direct, said, “Customers are increasingly turning to online shopping and at-home services for convenience and safety, and Firestone Direct is at the forefront of this movement for at-home car care. By bringing trusted vehicle care featuring the latest automotive technologies directly to the customer, Firestone Direct can leverage the expertise of our trained technicians with the ease of online booking and at-home service for maximum convenience.” (TT)

The global electric vehicle (EV) market has taken a tremendous leap forward, with new registrations reaching record market shares in nearly all countries. For the tyre development landscape, the accelerating growth of the EV market means a pervasive transformation.

Boosting circular economy

At Black Donuts, the impact of the EV trend can be seen everywhere, from the tyre designers’ desks to the new practices of tyre testing. Beyond meeting new demands of the EV sector, the procedures and practices are tuned to serve the company’s strategic goal: to spearhead the industry’s shift towards a circular economy.

Black Donuts launched the first EV tyre development projects with its tyre manufacturer customers in 2018. The internal research on EV tyres was initiated even before, at the time of the first EVs entering the market. “The first research project addressed the primary technological challenges: rolling resistance and noise,” says lkka Lehtoranta, Head of Tire and Material Development at Black Donuts.

In tyre design, it is essential to focus on specific aspects to ensure optimal performance for electric cars. Compared to combustion cars, tyres for Evs must carry a heavier load withstand high instant torque – and be efficient and quiet. 

Lately, the focus on tyre technology has shifted towards more comprehensive sustainability. Bio-based materials and compounds are opening new possibilities, and the rapid growth of the EV market accelerates the pace of development. ”The EV trend has highlighted the sustainability of tyres. The demand for bio-based materials and tyre recyclability has significantly increased,” says Jarkko Mällinen, Technology Development Manager of Black Donuts.

In cooperation with its partners, Black Donuts is investigating new possibilities to replace fossil-fuel-based raw materials with bio-based or renewable materials in all products, including studded tyres. The company is currently testing the use of bio-based plastics in stud bodies.

Also, end-of-life tyres are a hot topic in the industry, and Black Donuts is researching how the waste tyres can be recirculated and recycled back into the process. Even the tyre development process is undergoing a renaissance. New design tools for faster tyre development are being introduced, emphasising the key features of sustainable, future proof tyres.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

European PCLT (passenger car and light truck) tyre manufacturing capacity has risen over the past decade to meet increased demand, but there has been a major shift from plants in Western Europe, towards Central Europe and Russia. The move eastwards reflects substantial differences in operating costs between the two regions, specifically in terms of labour costs. Hourly labour rates in Central and Eastern Europe can typically be half to one quarter of those in the highest cost Western European countries. In particular this significant differential has resulted in the transfer of production of lower priced non-premium tyres to larger plants in Central and Eastern Europe. Numerous PCLT plant closures and downsizings in Western Europe have either been announced or enacted during the past 18 months.

In 2019 Cooper Tires ended PCLT tyre production at its small plant in the UK, and Michelin recently closed the PCLT tyre plant in Dundee that manufactured tier-1 brand tyres in lower rim-diameters (≤16”), a shrinking segment of the European market. These closures leave just the two PCLT tyre facilities operating in the country: the Pirelli plants that focus on low volume but high-margin premium tyres.

In Germany, Michelin has announced plans to close its Bamburg plant that also focused on lower-rim -diameter tyres, whilst Goodyear is restructuring operations at its PCLT tyre facilities located in Fulda and Hanau. Total capacity there will fall, but there will be an increase in production of premium tyres.

Pirelli has recently ceased production of car tyres at its Bollate plant in Italy, its only facility in Western or Central Europe that was manufacturing non-premium car tyres. Apollo Tyres plans to downsize PCLT capacity at its plant in the high-cost Netherlands, focusing the facility on high value tyres with short production runs. Management had stated that the company lost money on 70% of the PCLT tyres that it sold from the facility.

Despite these closures in Western Europe, expansion to the east is expected to result in the net addition of 30 million units of PCLT tyre capacity across Europe* by 2026. New plants that have been recently opened, or are currently under construction, are located in either central and eastern Europe or Russia. In 2017, Apollo Tyres opened a greenfield plant in Hungary, with first-phase capacity increasing to 5.5 million PCLT tyres and almost 0.7 million TBR tyres. Supply from the facility has substituted imports from India and now permits the planned downsizing and specialisation of production in the Netherlands.

In 2018, Hankook announced plans to add production of TBR tyres at its plant in Hungary, however this expansion was put on hold in late 2019. In phases, the company has already expanded PCLT tyre capacity until it is now one of the largest such facilities in the world. Meanwhile, Nexen has begun the ramp-up of capacity at its new plant in the Czech Republic; this will have added substantially to the country’s capacity by 2023.

In addition to further investments across Central and Eastern Europe by Continental Tire, Bridgestone and Pirelli, an expansion of premium tyre capacity in Slovenia has also been announced by Goodyear.

In mid-2019 Toyo Tire announced its intention to build a new tyre plant in Serbia, consolidating the country’s position as the leading location for new PCLT tyre manufacturing capacity in Europe. This follows Linglong’s decision to build its new European plant in the country and Cooper Tire’s plan to double the size of its facility. Based on analysis by Astutus Research of all announced capacity actions (plant opening and expansion net of closures and downsizing), Serbia will account for over 40% of planned capacity additions between 2019 and 2026.

Toyo expects to invest €390 million in its new facility that will have a capacity of 5 million units. It intends to start production in early 2022 and reach full capacity the following summer. Linglong’s facility will have a capacity of 12 million PCLT tyres, alongside truck and radial agricultural tyres, built in three phases and representing a total investment of over €800 million.

Serbia as new hub

Although there is demand for both replacement and original equipment PCLT tyres in Serbia, the domestic market is amongst the smallest in Europe and production will be export focused. The country has already emerged as a key source of budget tyres to the European Union and to Russia, predominantly from Tigar Tyre, Michelin’s low-cost tyre subsidiary, that has significantly increased capacity and production in the past decade.

Geographically, Serbia is well located to supply the major markets of the EU and Russia, and benefits from free trade agreements with both. Labour costs in the country are significantly lower than in the Czech Republic or Hungary, and labour availability is good, with a higher rate of unemployment.

At present Toyo imports tyres to Europe from its facilities in Japan and Malaysia; Linglong utilises its PCLT tyre plants in China and Thailand. Both companies aim to develop their presence in Europe, and local production should help them in this quest, particularly in the original equipment segment where the significantly shorter lead times will improve the competitiveness of their offer. Similarly, the opportunity to increase their share of the OE business was one of the motivations for Nexen and Apollo to replace imports to open a plant in the region.

Whilst the influence of the Covid-19 virus may slow the pace of some planned investment in central and eastern Europe, it has already accelerated the pace of closures in the west. Furthermore, we expect that it will result in further plant closures there, as the decline in European tyre demand dramatically reduces plant utilisation rates.

*Europe refers to Western, Central and Eastern Europe, including Russia and CIS, but excludes Turkey which we include in the Middle East & Africa region.

For capacity data: ‘Western Europe’ includes plants in Germany, France, Spain, Italy, the UK, Portugal, the Netherlands, Finland and Luxembourg. ‘Central Europe’ refers to Poland, Romania, Hungary, Czech Republic, Serbia, Slovakia and Slovenia. ‘Russia and CIS’ refers to Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Uzbekistan.

• Simon Hodson is Research Director at Astutus Research shodson@astutusresearch.com

The WHO has said that the outbreak is now officially a Pandemic. People/ companies/ organisations are still coming to grips on how to address the situation. Government heads of various countries are trying to curb the situation by restricting entries of people who are affected by countries that are affected the most. Thus, airlines would have only diplomats and other certain levels of people allowed to fly.  Many airlines have suspended a good number of their flights.  Many companies will be looking to take a hair cut on what they take back with them, just to see that business can be sustained during the trying situations. 

The virus has led various markets to crash, courier services have been curtailed in certain countries. All types of cancellations, be it sport, expositions or business, have affected the business world over. The transaction value in the losses may be difficult to gauge currently, however, it could be in the millions. Contracts would have to be reworked, and companies may have to come with new strategies. 

However, in every situation, there would be also a business opportunity, if you work your strategy right. The sale of masks, gloves, hand sanitisers, medical devices would be able to generate good business. Though it is seen that the outbreak is from China, you also got to give to them as to how they are trying to contain the situation by building hospital/s within 10 days. In other countries, this would easily have taken a much longer time period. 

It is a given that the business scenario is not going to be the best for most of the companies; Therefore, companies may have to think and reevaluate the way they are currently running their company. Companies will look to get leaner in every possible way. Cut down on unwanted expenses. Many companies have started asking their employees to work from home. Some may look to have lesser number of people and look to automate some of the work, especially in the factories.  Commercial properties being an expensive asset to maintain, some companies may look to perhaps go on rented co working spaces. Use less of one time use items like plastic and use more renewable/ reusable substitutes. Use of more environment friendly methods going forward will be the mantra. 

This hit on our social system in a way will make us pause, think and have better suggestions as to how to look after ourselves and our environment at large.