Is Natural Rubber under mortal threat? Is there a possibility that factors like climate change, diseases etc. will bring the plantation industry to its knees?

It is a fact that the traditional rubber growing regions in almost all rubber producing countries in Asia are increasingly constrained by adverse effects of Climate Change. The yield from Hevea in traditional regions is impacted by extreme weather, recurrent cyclones, depression rains and flash floods. The last couple of years have seen interruption to tapping due to unforeseen rains and floods. Another major constraining factor is the recurrent outbreak of new diseases. For example, the outbreak of a new fungal leaf disease (Pestalotiopsis leaf fall disease) reported in Indonesia in 2018 has now spread into around 387,000 ha of mature rubber trees in the country. An estimated 141,000 ha in Thailand, 16,000 ha in Malaysia and 4,000 ha in Sri Lanka are reportedly affected by new fungal leaf diseases.

The low rubber prices that continued over several years resulted in poor maintenance of rubber holdings in almost all producing countries. As resource-starved farmers could not apply fertilizers or adopt proper crop protection measures over several years, rubber trees became weak and lost their resistance to diseases and extreme weather. It is striking to note that the root cause of the decline in yield is the unattractive prices and the resultant poor maintenance of holdings. A major trend reversal of prices can bring glaring positive changes in the natural rubber production sector. The potential national average yield (i.e., the annual production from a unit hectare of tapped trees) is 20 to 30% higher than what is realized now. For example, the average yield in India is currently 1,400 kg per hectare.  But a favorable price can increase the average yield to the range of 1,750-1,800 kg. The country had realized the average yield of 1,823 kg in 2012 when the prices ruled high.  Moreover, a large extent of mature trees which are currently left untapped in the country will come back to production once farmers find the prices attractive.  The country has around 200,000 hectares of mature trees which are left untapped.

More specifically, it is the uneconomic return from the venture that hinders the natural rubber production sector. There is no mortal threat to the supply base as far as prices stay remunerative and the net profit from the venture is attractive. No industry can sustain for a long if it is economically unviable and natural rubber is no exception.

Can a COVID19 like pandemic impact NR industry long term? Do plantations have an effective healthcare plan to ensure labourers’ health and safety?

NR sector globally has almost fully recovered from the impact of the Covide-19. This is particularly true with reference to the global production, consumption, trade, and prices of natural rubber. The prices in key physical markets had crossed over the pre-covid level even by October 2020 and firmed up further since February 2021. 

It is true that the production and processing sectors in Thailand and Malaysia are partly hindered as cross-border travel restrictions prevent migrant workers from neighboring countries to return to works. This issue, to a large extent, is resolved by making use of local workers by providing them necessary skills training. Coming to the downstream manufacturing sector, large number of debt-burden units in the MSME sector are reportedly struggling hard to bring their businesses back to normal.  On the other side, large-scale manufacturing units, particularly those in auto-tyre manufacturing, have made V-shaped recovery driven by the pent-up momentum generated on lifting of the lockdowns. For healthcare rubber products such as rubber gloves, the epidemic has been a major boon. Taking the global rubber industry as a whole, the industry has already come out from the impact of the pandemic.

Workers engaged in large plantations are provided with social security and healthcare facilities as per the regulatory provisions being followed by the governments in the respective countries.

What are the chances of NR getting totally replaced by alternative rubbers? Will this happen? If so, how soon?

NR getting totally replaced by any alternative material is an impossible event in any case. The relative share of NR in the total quantity of new rubber (i.e., natural rubber and synthetic rubber) globally consumed was less than 30% during early 1970s. From that low level, the relative share of NR has gone up to nearly 50% as of now (47.2% in 2020). Synthetic rubber and natural rubber are not competing each other because technical considerations limit the scope of substitution between the two.

Lack of sufficient economic benefits is considered to be a reason for planters looking for alternate crops that can bring faster financial returns. How real is this? How much of rubber plantations have been replaced by other crops?

A total extent of nearly 0.6 million hectares of rubber trees was estimated to have cut down during 2015-2020 period in Thailand, Viet Nam, China, Malaysia, and India for cultivation of other crops or for conversion of land for non-farm uses. The details are given below:

In the case of Thailand, farmers are offered attractive cash incentive (More than US$3500 per hectare) by the government for removing aged rubber trees and planting other crops. It means, the shift from rubber in Thailand is largely policy driven. The case of Thailand is an exception. Generally speaking, the crop shift from rubber over the past few years is caused by the unattractive net profit from the venture.

Is plantation industry too slow to modernise itself, technologically as well as in terms of attracting skilled labor?

It is a fact that technological progress is severely constrained in the smallholder-dominated rubber production sector. The unattractive prices that prevailed over the period since 2015 made the farmers deprived of resources. Although high-yielding clones are available, farmers are generally postponing the replating of aged low-yielding trees due to their inability to meet the huge replanting cost. Another factor that prevents smallholders from replanting is the uncertainty of the farmers over the long-term prospects of rubber cultivation. Unattractive prices have also discouraged farmers from adopting good agricultural practices. Poor return from the venture has compelled farmers to discontinue the application of fertilizers, pest and disease management measures, and proper maintenance of holdings. Larger section of farmers has discontinued the use of stimulants and rain-guarded tapping. However, technological progress continued in large plantations owned by corporates, enterprises, and the public sector.

NR supply has always been unstable due to various reasons. Is this prompting manufacturers to look for other options?

There is no serios supply constraint or supply uncertainty as of now except the seasonal shortage.  Moreover, all the producing countries have huge potential to increase their supply if the prices become attractive.  This point was elaborated earlier.

Is there a campaign being run by alternative rubber sector to put pressure on NR industry?

As stated earlier, NR does not face any threat from alternatives basically due to the reason that the only substitute for natural rubber is natural rubber. In the total global consumption of new rubber (i.e., natural rubber plus synthetic rubber), the relative share of NR is currently around 50% (47.2% in 2020) as against less than 30% in early 1970s. There is no reason to anticipate a fall in the relative share of NR in the next three decades at least.

Are environmental sustainability factors detrimental to NR cultivation?

Environmental considerations can only help NR to gain preference over synthetic rubber, polyurethane, and other materials in various applications because natural rubber is recognised as “an environment-friendly industrial raw material and renewable resource”. The following points establish such a view:

1. Rubber plantations purify atmosphere by absorbing CO₂ and releasing O₂. Based on scientific research undertaken by rubber research institutes in five countries, it is empirically proven that a hectare of rubber plantation annually sequesters as much as 30 tonnes of CO₂ from atmosphere which is near to that of the Amazonian base.
2. Rubber plantations are a good source of timber and bulk of this goes into furniture industry thereby protecting large extent of forests from being logged every year. Secondary branches of the rubber trees go into the fiber board industry and small twigs are used by the rural people as a source of firewood, both indirectly saving forests.
3. Rubber plantations contribute to sustainable soil productivity. Soil productivity has not deteriorated in any of the traditional rubber growing countries which have the history of growing rubber for more than 100 years and already completed 3-4 rubber plantation cycles. 
4. One of the key factors which had adversely affected food crops production in the last couple of years was climate change.  Rubber plantations offer solution to this as it helps balancing carbon level in atmosphere.  Rubber is no longer a mono crop.  Several food crops are grown along with rubber plants in all NR producing countries. The concept of raising rubber plantations as agro-forestry is being increasingly promoted across countries.  It is common among rubber farmers to maintain a portion of their land for other crops.  Moreover, rubber holdings provide sources of ancillary income through activities such as horticulture, fishery, honeybee, goat farming, etc. 
5. In all major natural rubber growing countries, rubber has been identified as a major tool of poverty alleviation and thus helping to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Are there any concerted efforts being taken up by organisations like ANRPC, IRSG or governments that subsidise NR cultivation?

Developmental activities such as promotion of new-planting and replanting in each country are undertaken by the respective governments only. Among the member governments of ANRPC, Thailand, Malaysia, India, and Sri Lanka provide financial incentives to farmers to promote the cultivation of rubber. The governments usually mobilize the funds needed for the purpose from the same sector by levying a cess on the quantity of NR exported from the country or consumed within the country. The financial assistance cannot be termed as a ‘subsidy’ because the funds needed for the purposes are mobilized from the same sector.

Is it possible to have a globally uniform price structure for NR that can ensure interrupted supply?

In a market driven global economy, commodity prices are largely determined by the forces of supply and demand. This is particularly true in the case of NR which is a strategic industrial raw material coming from more than 10 million smallholder farmers world over. It is not practical to regulate NR prices globally as it is a real challenge to bring together all major producing countries and consuming countries for such a common agenda on terms acceptable to all. (TT)

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Europe’s tyre industry stands at a crossroads as mounting regulatory pressure, resource constraints and circular economy targets reshape the end-of-life tyre landscape. Despite Germany achieving one of the world’s highest recycling rates, an estimated 100,000 tonnes of used tyres continue to leave the country annually, undermining domestic recovery efforts. In conversation with Tyre Trends, AZuR Network Coordinator Anna-Maria Guth outlines the policy reforms, recycling technologies, retreading opportunities and cross-border collaboration needed to keep valuable raw materials in circulation and build a fully circular European tyre ecosystem.

What gaps in the traditional tyre value chain led to the establishment of the AZuR network?

In Germany, we have a very high recycling rate for end-of-life tyres. However, following a merger of certified tyre disposal companies that collect and sort tyres, it became clear that we needed to bring all stakeholders together to really make progress. The excellent response to the AZuR network shows that this is the right approach.

The European tyre industry is under increasing pressure regarding emissions, waste management and the circular economy. What policy measures are still needed to accelerate the widespread adoption of tyre recycling?

Couple of policy implementations must be achieved in order to reach this goal. The first is a strict ban on the export of ELTs and rigorous enforcement of this regulation. Secondly, clear, predictable and statutory regulations regarding the use of ELT granulate. Lastly, consistent implementation of circular economy strategies.

What role can recovered carbon black (rCB) play in reducing Europe’s dependence on primary fossil raw materials?

The pyrolysis companies in the AZuR network are making great strides in improving the quality of rCB. We are optimistic that in the foreseeable future, we will be able to produce a grade that allows the material to be incorporated into new tyres in larger quantities. That would be a major breakthrough and would create real added value as it would keep the raw materials within the circular economy.

How does AZuR distinguish between mechanical recycling, devulcanisation and pyrolysis in terms of sustainability and scalability?

Within the network, we adhere to the European waste hierarchy viz-a-viz prevention, reuse, recycle including mechanical and chemical and, finally, thermal recycling.

We are open to all technologies when it comes to processes. However, it is clear that in the interests of the circular economy, we want to minimise thermal recovery. And this also applies to pyrolysis oil provided it is not used for the production of new products but as a secondary fuel.

How close is the tyre industry to establishing tyres made with recycled materials without compromising on performance?

Some manufacturers are already field-testing tyres containing over 70 percent recycled and bio-based raw materials. The industry is very active in this area. However, we would like to see a more nuanced approach to recycled materials and bio-based materials.

Bio-based materials cannot be the solution in the medium term and the EUDR is already restricting the use of bio-based materials in Europe. Our focus must be more on recycled materials and their qualities so that raw materials can be kept in the cycle.

More than 500,000 tonnes of end-of-life tyres are generated in Germany every year. What are currently the biggest bottlenecks in the infrastructure for collection, sorting and processing?

At present, the SME sector in Germany is structured in such a way that all tyres generated can be collected, sorted and processed. Our biggest challenge is that the material is currently being exported rather than ending up with responsible companies in the circular economy. We estimate that around 100,000 tonnes are exported annually without proper regulation.

How will the network influence future EU regulations on the circular economy?

We are delighted to be engaging in growing dialogue with EU bodies, which enables us to raise the profile of the circular economy, which is dominated by small and medium-sized enterprises. Our aim is to set the right course at European level as quickly as possible so that companies can work successfully with the materials and keep as many raw materials as possible in the cycle.

Which groundbreaking technologies or business models are currently attracting the most attention?

There are quite a few, and to name just a few, we have companies in the network working on AI-driven solutions for tyre sorting as well as start-ups producing devulcanised materials for the new tyre industry or AI-assisted machines for the professional regrooving of truck tyres.

How important is cross-border cooperation in establishing a sustainable circular economy for tyres across Europe, rather than in isolated national markets?

AZuR started as a German network, but we can now safely say that we have become a European network. We have partners from Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Ukraine, Estonia and Poland. All these countries face similar challenges as the relevant legislation is often decided at European level and we can achieve very little at national level. We can only take the big steps together in Europe.

How difficult is it to reconcile economic interests within such a diverse ecosystem?

All AZuR partners are united by a shared vision of 100 percent recycling of end-of-life tyres generated in Europe. We know that this is economically viable. However, we also know that we can only tackle the hurdles that are currently preventing us from reaching our goal by working together.

Our target of 100 percent recycling of end-of-life tyres is very realistic and, in our view, can be achieved in the short term with the right measures.

How do you respond to the market’s ongoing concerns regarding the safety, quality and performance of retreaded tyres?

The retreaders currently operating in Germany are industrial retreaders whose quality standards are in no way inferior to those of new tyre manufacturers. Real-world use shows that there are no quality limitations with retreaded tyres. When retreaded, the casings from premium manufacturers offer a quality comparable to that of the original new tyre.

Incidentally, the safety of the technology is demonstrated by retreaders of aircraft tyres as such tyres are retreaded 12 to 14 times and are highly relevant to safety. And retreading is the ideal solution for recycling as it allows the tyre to be used a second and third time as a tyre.

Why has retreading uptake in the passenger car sector remained relatively limited compared to that in the commercial vehicle sector?

One of the major challenges facing retreading in the passenger car sector is the vast variety of sizes, which makes retreading economically unviable. We are constantly seeking dialogue with vehicle manufacturers on this issue.

Furthermore, passenger car tyres are often in use for longer because they are driven less frequently, meaning fewer casings are available for retreading. However, we believe in passenger car tyre retreading, particularly given the growing share of electric vehicles, and are delighted that a retreader in Germany will be relaunching operations in this segment this year.

How important will AI, predictive analytics and sensor-based tyre management become over the next decade?

Smart tyre management is both an economic factor for haulage companies and an environmental one. We know that how a tyre is used has a significant impact on its service life. And at the top of the waste hierarchy is waste prevention. Here, both the new tyre industry and users are called upon to make optimal use of tyres so that they can remain in service for as long as possible.

What would success look like for AZuR in the next five years?

We would have reason to celebrate if we were to achieve the following key objectives in the coming years. The objectives include 40 percent market share for retreaded lorry tyres in Europe, 10 percent market share for retreaded passenger car tyres in Europe, 100 percent recycling of end-of-life tyres in Europe and clear legal regulations governing the use of recycled ELTs.   

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Epsilon Carbon has significantly expanded its manufacturing footprint with the formal activation of a new 300,000-tonne-per-annum speciality carbon plant in Vijayanagar, Karnataka. This latest addition brings the company’s aggregate production capacity in this segment to 600,000 tonnes annually, a development that elevates the firm to a leading position among domestic producers and reinforces India’s broader influence in the international speciality carbon market.

The new installation operates on a fully digitised manufacturing architecture, incorporating real-time process monitoring, automated quality controls and interconnected production systems. Such technological integration is intended to minimise operational variability, maximise throughput and provide overseas buyers with a stable and predictable supply base across multiple product categories.

Output from the Vijayanagar complex will encompass a wide array of coal-tar derivatives, including binder and impregnated pitches, refined naphthalene, anthracene and creosote oils and wash oil. These intermediates find application across a spectrum of heavy and light industries, ranging from primary aluminium and graphite electrode production to tyre compounding, pigment formulation, pharmaceutical synthesis and speciality construction materials.

Looking ahead, the company has outlined a trajectory towards further capacity enhancement, with a proposed integrated facility in Jharsuguda, Odisha, expected to push total speciality carbon output to one million tonnes per annum by the end of the decade. Meanwhile, the Karnataka plant has been configured with closed-loop water management, recycling all treated effluent internally, and derives its entire power requirement from a 17‑megawatt captive unit running on recycled process off-gases. Certifications such as Responsible Care, EcoVadis Silver and SA8000 attest to the company’s adherence to stringent safety, environmental and labour standards.

Gaurav Mathur, Chief Executive Officer, Epsilon Carbon, said, "This expansion reflects India's growing capability to become a global supplier of speciality carbon materials. With 600,000 TPA of Speciality Carbon capacity, we are strengthening supply chain resilience for both domestic industries and international customers, particularly the global aluminium sector. As the world looks to diversify supply chains, Epsilon Carbon is proud to contribute to India's emergence as a reliable, sustainable and globally competitive manufacturing hub."

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

HS HYOSUNG ADVANCED MATERIALS participated in the China Composite Expo 2026 (CCE 2026), held at the National Exhibition and Convention Center in Shanghai from 1 to 3 September. This annual event stands as Asia’s largest specialised exhibition for composite materials, drawing a significant global audience.

The company has been a consistent participant in CCE since 2013, leveraging the expo to progressively reinforce its foothold in the Asian market. At this year’s showcase, the strategic focus was on its portfolio of high-performance carbon fibre products, which are increasingly recognised as essential materials for advanced sectors including energy, mobility and aerospace due to their superior tensile strength and modulus.

Central to the presentation were actual samples of TANSOME, the company’s proprietary carbon fibre brand developed through in-house technologies. The exhibit featured a diverse range of applications, from mobility components like automotive wheels, hoods and brake discs to sporting goods such as hockey sticks and pickleball rackets, as well as high-pressure vessels for hydrogen and oxygen, drones and wire cores.

In parallel, HS HYOSUNG ADVANCED MATERIALS emphasised its robust manufacturing capabilities and stable supply chain, supported by production bases in Korea, China and Vietnam. This strategy reinforces its standing as a leading global carbon fibre manufacturer. Notably, the company achieved a milestone in 2011 as the first in Korea to independently develop TANSOME, a material 4 times lighter and 10 times stronger than steel. This was followed by the 2022 launch of H3065, a T-1000-grade fibre with strength exceeding steel by over 14 times, designed for demanding aerospace applications.

Jin Dal Lim, CEO, HS HYOSUNG ADVANCED MATERIALS, said, “This exhibition is an important opportunity to further strengthen strategic partnerships with global customers and demonstrate the outstanding technological capabilities of HS HYOSUNG’s carbon fibre. We will continue to build deeper trust in the global market based on world-class product quality and stable supply capabilities.”

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!

Bekaert has taken a decisive step towards reshaping its operational footprint in Sardinia by securing a preliminary deal with Nuova Icom, a local engineering entity. The arrangement paves the way for the handover of the Macchiareddu premises and guarantees job continuity for the existing staff stationed there, subject to the final stipulations of the contract.

The decision stems from long-term turbulence in the tyre sector, which has steadily undermined the commercial viability of the plant's primary output. With tyre cord manufacturing struggling to remain profitable amidst evolving industry dynamics, the company concluded that a fundamental operational shift was unavoidable.

This initiative follows an extensive search for sustainable alternatives, emphasising regional employment preservation. Bekaert remains attuned to the social ramifications of the transition and pledges to engage transparently with all affected parties. The prospective ownership change is scheduled for completion by October 2026, pending regulatory clearances and the finalisation of employee consultations.

Comments (0)

ADD COMMENT

Link Copied!